Know where you actually stand
A simple score out of 100, plus the headline you can repeat to your board: named in 34 of 60 answers, first choice in 9 of them, up from 6 last month.
See how the score worksFor teams who sell onlineSix AI assistants
Your buyers ask AI.We make sure it names you.
Your buyers already ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity what to buy — and most never reach your website. See what all six AI assistants say about you, catch the moment a competitor takes your place, and get the exact fix that wins the recommendation back — delivered automatically, every week.
Fourteen days of full access. No card, no contract, cancel any month. Every week you wait is another week competitors get recommended instead of you.
Illustrative example data
Product walkthrough
Watch the whole thing in four minutes
One cycle, start to finish: the questions we ask, what the AI answers, why a competitor got named instead of you, and what we hand you to fix it.
4 min · no signup
Walkthrough video · slot reserved
To activate this player, pass the Loom share URL as loomUrl to <VideoShowcase />. Nothing is requested from Loom until a visitor presses play.
In one paragraph
What we actually do for you
What is the AI Visibility Tracker?
It is your early-warning system for lost AI recommendations. It watches what the major AI assistants tell your buyers about you, flags the moment a competitor wins your place, and hands you the fixes ranked so the fastest, highest-impact one comes first — while the revenue is still winnable.
- See what every major AI assistant says about you, in one place
- Know the exact reason a competitor was recommended instead
- Get the fix drafted for you, ranked by how fast it pays off
- Hear about a wrong or damaging claim while it is still fixable
- Prove to your board what changed, with a before and after
- Feed the same numbers to your own tools through an API
What you get
One screen that answers the only question that matters
Whether you are being recommended, who is being recommended instead, and what to do about it this week. No dashboards full of charts you will never open.
- 6
- AI assistants watched
- 10
- Buyer questions
- 60
- Checks every week
- 5 min
- To your first fix
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI
Written from your real pricing and features
10 questions × 6 assistants
Ranked by how fast it pays off
How it works
Four steps to winning the recommendation
Connect once. From then on the monitoring, scoring, alerts and drafted fixes run on their own — you just see what changed and what to ship.
- 01
See exactly what AI tells your buyers
Connect your website and competitors once. From then on you see the ten questions real buyers ask and what every major AI assistant answered — who got named, who got picked, and where you stood.
Your market, monitored every week
- 02
Catch competitors taking your deals
Your answers are re-checked across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google’s AI answers every week. The moment a rival replaces you — or the AI says something wrong about you — you get the exact quote and the source behind it.
Alerts with evidence, not just scores
- 03
Know precisely why you lost
Every result comes with the reason. Maybe a competitor’s pricing page is clearer, a review site never mentions you, or the AI simply cannot read part of your site. You get the actual quote, not a score with no explanation.
The exact sentence and the source behind it
- 04
Ship the fix that wins you back
A ranked action list ordered by fastest payoff first — starting with a five-minute answer to the exact objection the AI raised. Copy it, publish it, or ask us to do it for you.
From five minutes, ranked by payoff
Everything included
Six things you get, every week
Bundled into one subscription. No add-on modules, no “contact us for the AI features”.
Get told when something goes wrong
If an AI starts warning buyers off you, makes up a price you do not charge, or quietly drops you from its shortlist, you hear about it with the exact quote and a prepared response.
How the alerts workFind out what is blocking you
A 100-point health check of your site: can the AI crawlers even get in, is there an llms.txt file, is your pricing machine-readable, and is a robots.txt rule quietly hiding you.
See the 100-point checkGet the fix, not just the diagnosis
Answers written to the exact objection, an llms.txt file, the schema that tells AI who you are, and an honest comparison page. All drafted for you, with placeholders where we need a real number.
See what you getFind the questions you forgot to ask
Six new buyer questions every run, based on the gaps in your own data — the frustrated switcher, the tight budget, the “what do Reddit and G2 actually say” query.
How we find themShow the result, not a promise
Every fix you complete gets its score frozen before you start. When the next week’s answers come in you see exactly what moved — and what did not. No vendor can promise a specific lift; we show you the measurement.
How we prove itGo deeper
Comparisons, engines and the published math
Six head-to-head comparisons that concede where rivals win, four per-surface playbooks, the exact scoring formulas, and the agent integration your engineers will ask about.
GEO vs the tools you already shortlisted
Otterly, Profound, Peec AI, Writesonic, Semrush and Geoptie — each with an honest concession, a side-by-side matrix and a migration path that keeps history.
Compare all sixChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI
How each assistant answers differently — retrieval fleets, shortlist structure, consensus rules — and the fastest fix per surface.
Read the engine playbooksFormulas, weights and thresholds
Position weight, five stance multipliers, 0–100 normalization, the 100-point audit split and the forecast model with its caveats.
Check the mathYour IDE reads the same numbers
Six brand-scoped MCP tools over Streamable HTTP for Cursor, Claude Desktop and your own scripts.
Connect an agentWhile you decide
Your competitors are in this week's answers. Are you?
Every buying question your market asks this week gets answered with or without you in it. Start your free cycle today and see exactly where you stand before next Monday's check.
Proof you can forward
The report your board will actually read
One page: where you stand, who is beating you and why, what the site is doing wrong, and the ninety-day plan. Export it as a PDF or send a private link.
CSV & JSON exportPrint-ready PDFPrivate share link
What you walk away with
Five fixes, smallest first
We start with the thing that takes five minutes, because that is usually what changes the answer fastest. Every asset comes drafted, with anything we could not verify left clearly marked for you to fill in.
We never invent facts
If we do not know your real pricing or your real review count, we leave a marker for you to fill in. No fake numbers and no made-up badges — the fastest way to lose an AI’s trust is to be caught overstating.
- 01
Objection-Buster FAQ
5 minutesA ≤45-word direct answer to the exact objection the engine raised, plus FAQPage JSON-LD.
- 02
llms.txt production asset
5 minutesA complete /llms.txt file: proposition, capability matrix, pricing, key pages, contact.
- 03
Entity disambiguation
10 minutesOrganization JSON-LD with sameAs slots and step-by-step placement instructions.
- 04
Versus blueprint
2 hoursAn honest comparison page with a capability matrix, when-to-choose-each, and migration friction.
- 05
Citation authority outreach
OngoingA non-promotional, affiliation-disclosing contribution draft for the source that decided the answer.
Why this matters now
The shortlist happens before your website
A buyer used to get ten links and click around. Now they get two or three names and a reason. If you are not one of those names, nothing in your analytics will ever tell you it happened — those are deals you never got to compete for.
There is no page two
The AI names two or three options and stops. Being fourth is the same as not existing, and no impression or click records the loss.
It cites other people about you
Answers are built from review sites, forums and comparison posts. If those describe you narrowly, the AI recommends you narrowly — however good your own pages are.
It changes without telling you
Models get re-indexed constantly. A first-choice position can become an also-ran in one week with nothing changing on your side.
You can only fix what you can see
Measuring once a quarter hides the fall entirely. Measuring weekly tells you which week it happened and which fix brought it back.
The assistants we cover
- ChatGPTChatGPT
- ClaudeClaude
- GeminiGemini
- PerplexityPerplexity
- Google AI OverviewsAI Overviews
- Google AI ModeAI Mode
Google’s AI Overviews and AI Mode are two different experiences built on the same search index. We report them separately and never pretend they are two different companies.
Before you buy
What this is not
Every vendor has limits. These are ours, in the place you will actually read them.
The answers arrive once a week, not live
We check every Monday rather than watching continuously. That is deliberate: a weekly reading is what tells you which week a position moved. If you need a live feed, we are the wrong tool.
The cost estimate is an estimate
The “what being left out may be costing you” figure is a model based on your own decision-stage questions, not a measurement of lost revenue. We label it as an estimate everywhere it appears.
A machine reads the answers, and you can overrule it
Judging whether a paragraph counts as a recommendation is a language task, and language tasks are occasionally wrong. You can correct any citation in two clicks and the score updates immediately.
The community drafts are drafts
We write the Reddit reply, the review-site contribution and the outreach note. We never post them. Publishing under your name is your call, always.
Pricing
Two ways to use it
Run it yourself and hand the fixes to your team, or have us do the implementation. Same data, same weekly checks, different amount of your time.
Tier 1 · Self-serve
Software Intelligence
$149per month
For teams with internal engineering and content bandwidth.
- All six tracked AI surfaces
- Weekly cycles with automatic run generation
- AI Health Check: crawler access, llms.txt, schema, semantic structure
- Query Discovery and Content Studio
- The full ranked remediation queue
- MCP access for Cursor, Claude Desktop and your own agents
- Executive report with confidential share link
Tier 2 · Done-for-you
Managed GEO Sprint
$2,500–$3,500per month
We become your AI search engineering partner and ship the fixes.
- Everything in Software Intelligence
- A dedicated AI search optimization engineer
- Implementation of all five remediation tiers
- Citation authority seeding across agreed community and review hubs
- Weekly score-lift tracking and board-ready reports
- A direct channel to the engineering team
What we will not do: promise you a score increase
Nobody controls what six independent AI assistants say next week. What we commit to is measurement: the score is frozen the moment you mark a fix complete, and the next week’s reading shows what actually moved. If a fix did nothing, the report says so. Compare both plans in detail.
Common questions
Straight answers
These are also published in a machine-readable format, so an AI answering the same question quotes exactly what you read here.
What is AI search visibility, and why does it matter now?
AI search visibility is whether conversational engines name your brand when a buyer asks for a recommendation. Instead of ten blue links, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI surfaces return a two-to-three option shortlist. If you are not in it, no click, no impression and no analytics event records the loss — the buyer simply never learns you exist.
How does GEO measure it?
Each brand tracks ten grounded buyer-intent prompts across six AI surfaces, producing sixty checks per weekly cycle. Every check yields a recommendation stance, a sentiment, a position and a citation list. Visibility is position-weighted and stance-weighted, then normalised to a 0–100 score so it is directly comparable week over week.
What is the difference between SEO, AEO and GEO?
SEO optimises for a ranked list of links. AEO optimises to be the extracted answer. GEO optimises to be the source a generative engine reasons over and cites. The same foundations serve all three, but AEO and GEO weight structure, crawler access, entity clarity and third-party corroboration far more heavily than keyword density.
Does the platform query the AI engines automatically?
Run generation, response extraction, scoring, drift detection and remediation drafting are automated. Answer collection runs on a weekly cycle rather than continuously, so this is drift detection — not live monitoring, and not a real-time alerting system.
What do you actually do about a bad result?
Every gap becomes a ranked asset with an effort badge, ranked by time to value: a five-minute objection-buster answer, an llms.txt file, entity disambiguation schema, a versus blueprint, then citation authority outreach. Each one ships with draft copy you can paste or hand to our engineers.
Can our own agents and tools read the data?
Yes. The platform exposes a Model Context Protocol server at /api/mcp with six brand-scoped tools covering citation reports, prompts, sources and the action queue, authenticated with per-brand bearer tokens so an engineering agent can pull visibility data into your own workflows.
Start here
Find out what AI says about you this week
Connect your site and competitors in minutes and see what AI tells your buyers about you — before another round of recommendations goes to your competitors. Fourteen days free, no card required.